Erreur de la base de données de WordPress : [Access denied for user: 'ilidir@%' to database 'ilidir']
UPDATE wp_options SET option_value = '1337726344' WHERE option_name = 'gltr_last_connection_time'
Yet another web analytic's blog
August 27
It is not uncommon to find such lines in the report "Traffic Sources> All Traffic Sources:
These visitors from different webmails whose referrer can be incredibly numerous.
The idea here is to combine all traffic within a single source that we call "Webmail".
Here are some examples of current French webmails that we can identify:
mail.google.com
mail.live.com
hotmail.msn.com
webmail.laposte.net
mail.caramail.lycos.fr
imp.free.fr
mail.yahoo.com
webmail.aol.com
mail3.voila.fr
mail1.voila.fr
mail2.voila.fr
webmail.aliceadsl.fr
webmail.calixo.net
webmail22f.orange.fr
webmail26c.orange.fr
flashmail-1t2.club-internet.fr
flashmail-10v.club-internet.fr
wmail1.noos.fr
webmail.mgp.neufgp.fr
etc..
we can cover the majority of these lines with the following expression without the risk of including too many referrers who were not webmails:
mail (.*) \ .(.*) \ .. (2,4)
This is the advanced filter to retain the kind of webmail:
Attention is the source of the campaign, not the reffers ( "External link" in the jargon GA) to be addressed
Here's what it will:

This type of filter is interesting to visitors arriving on the site by an email "natural" outside mail newsletter or purchase to be tracked in dedicated campaigns.
We tested a filter replacement to address the source of the campaign but that did not work (if someone knows why thank you from me know in comment:))
Automatic translation (with Google translate):
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Responses for "Group webmails"
Thank you Olivier for these filters so useful (and so logical that they should be born in solutions of hearing!)
It does this with suppliers webmails in co.uk or com.fr?
Benjamin
Hello Benjamin,
No, it will not work in this case it would change the regexp for that
Reply